Cache Exchange Fund: fees, minimum and an exchange fund review for concentrated stock.
The published fee ladder in full, the seven year lock, the 20% illiquid sleeve nobody prices, and the cases where direct indexing is the better answer. Then a tool for testing the index you would end up holding.
Educational only · Never places a trade
In short
Cache runs exchange funds: you contribute an appreciated stock position to a partnership, receive units of a fund built around an index such as the S&P 500 or Nasdaq-100, and defer the capital gain instead of realising it. The published management fee runs 0.40% to 0.95% a year on gross assets, dropping to 0.25% after seven years. The 0.40% that gets quoted is the $25,000,000 rate. A realistic entry of $100,000 to $249,999 pays 0.95%. Two things the reviews leave out: tax rules force the fund to hold 20% of its assets in illiquid qualifying assets like real estate, which is why Cache guides to 2% to 4% tracking error rather than an ETF's 1%, and every commercial term gets worse the less you contribute.
Last updated August 2026
What a Cache exchange fund is
An exchange fund solves one problem, and it is not the problem most people bring to it
Exchange funds, sometimes called swap funds, have existed since the 1960s. The structure is a limited partnership. Several investors each contribute a large single-stock position, the partnership pools them, and each investor receives units worth what they put in. Because a contribution of property to a partnership is generally not a sale, no capital gain is realised on the way in. Your cost basis carries over to the units.
From the close of the exchange your economic exposure is the fund, not your original stock. That part is immediate. What takes seven years is the ability to redeem a diversified basket of securities instead of getting your original shares back, and that is the step the whole product is built around.
So the honest framing is narrow. An exchange fund is for someone who already holds a large appreciated position, does not want to write a capital gains cheque to diversify, and can leave the money alone for seven years. If you are investing new money, this is the wrong instrument by a wide margin, and an ETF or a direct indexing account will cost you a fraction as much.
Cache is a newer entrant against incumbents like Eaton Vance and Morgan Stanley, and it has pushed the fee down and the minimum with it. It says it has passed $1 billion in assets. It also says, in its own help centre, that no fund has completed a full seven year cycle yet.
Cache exchange fund fees
What Cache costs, and why "from 0.40%" describes almost nobody
Cache publishes a complete fee schedule, which is more than most exchange fund managers do. The rate is set by cumulative contributions and it is not bracketed: once you qualify for a tier, that single rate applies to your entire balance across all Cache funds. The dollar column is one year of the management fee at the bottom of each tier.
| Cumulative contribution | Annual management fee | Cost per year at tier floor | What you actually get |
|---|---|---|---|
| $100,000 to $249,999 | 0.95% | $950 | Entry tier. Access fund series, accredited investors. |
| $250,000 to $499,999 | 0.85% | $2,125 | Access fund series. |
| $500,000 to $999,999 | 0.70% | $3,500 | Access fund series. |
| $1,000,000 to $4,999,999 | 0.60% | $6,000 | Access fund series. |
| $5,000,000 to $24,999,999 | 0.50% | $25,000 | Flagship series threshold. Index Sync available. |
| $25,000,000 and above | 0.40% | $100,000 | The rate that gets quoted as "from 0.40%". |
| After seven years in the fund | 0.25% | n/a | Applies once you pass the seven year mark. |
The advertised rate is the $25 million rate
"From 0.40%" is accurate and it is also the top of a six rung ladder. To pay it you need to have contributed $25,000,000. The investor who can actually clear the entry point pays 0.95%, which is 2.4 times the quoted floor and roughly ten times what a broad market index fund charges. That is not a scandal, it is a fee schedule, but it means the number in the headline and the number on your statement are unlikely to be the same one, and every comparison you read should be re-run at your own tier.
Everything else gets worse at the bottom too
The fee is only the visible part. Cache splits its funds into a Flagship series for qualified purchasers, meaning $5,000,000 or more in investments, and an Access series for accredited investors. The smaller investor lands in Access, and Access carries a 2% early redemption fee where Flagship carries 1%, does not include Index Sync, which is the feature that tightens tracking to the benchmark, and redeems into a fixed basket of 20 to 25 stocks rather than a customisable mix of ETFs and individual stocks. The product being described in most reviews is the $5,000,000 product.
Cache also states there are no sales, subscription or performance fees, that underlying ETF expenses apply in the Flagship series, and that redemption fees fall away entirely after seven years. Figures taken from Cache's published fee article, checked August 2026.
The 20% you did not ask for
Why an S&P 500 exchange fund is only about 80% an S&P 500 fund
To qualify for the tax treatment, an exchange fund has to satisfy the partnership rules that keep it from being treated as an investment company. In practice that means at least 20% of its assets must sit in qualifying illiquid assets, typically real estate or other private holdings. Cache says this plainly: the fund invests in qualifying assets which "may include real estate, private funds, or other investments consistent with Exchange Fund requirements."
This is not a manager's allocation call that a better manager could avoid. It is the price of admission for the whole structure, and it applies to every exchange fund, not just Cache's. The consequence is that a fund benchmarked to the S&P 500 holds roughly 80 cents of index exposure and 20 cents of something else per dollar, and it is levered at the fund level to help close that gap.
You can see the effect in the numbers each firm publishes about itself. Cache tells investors its goal is an annualised tracking error of 2% to 4% for the exchange funds, and that it aims to beat that guidance using Index Sync, its ETF-based rebalancing feature. For contrast, Cache says the underlying ETF it uses is expected to track within 1% of the S&P 500.
That is the answer to a question people actually type: whether Cache or Frec tracks the S&P 500 more closely. On the published figures it is Frec, and not by a small margin. Frec headlines plus or minus 1% and its footnote reports an observed standard deviation of excess return of about plus or minus 0.77% a year over 36 simulation runs. An account that holds only the stocks can replicate an equity index far more tightly than a partnership required to park a fifth of itself in real estate. If tracking the index closely is your actual objective, the exchange fund structure is working against you, and you should read the Frec direct indexing breakdown before you decide.
None of that makes the tracking error a dealbreaker. If you are sitting on a position that is 60% of your net worth, moving from single-stock risk to something within a few points of the index is an enormous improvement in risk, and 3% of tracking error is a rounding error next to that. The point is to know what you bought.
Bedrock
S&P 500
Introduced Summer 2025, the launch vehicle for Index Sync.
Unix
Nasdaq-100
Cache reported a 0.99 correlation to the benchmark in 2025.
Mosaic
S&P 500 Growth
Growth tilt on the same structure.
Index Sync and the Flagship funds above are open to qualified purchasers, which Cache defines as $5,000,000 or more in investments.
The seven year hold
"Diversified immediately" and "you can redeem early" are both true, and they do not combine
Both claims appear in Cache's own material and both are correct. You are economically diversified from the day the exchange closes, and you are not trapped, because early redemption exists. The trouble is what an early redemption gives you.
Before the seventh anniversary, the tax code requires that a redemption be satisfied by returning your original contributed stock rather than a diversified basket. Cache spells this out and gives a worked example: contribute $1,000,000 of one stock, redeem after three years, and what comes back is that same stock, adjusted for how the fund and the stock each moved in the meantime. On top of that there is a 1% redemption fee in the Flagship funds and 2% in the Access funds.
Put those together and the early exit hands you back the concentrated position you paid to escape, minus a fee, having paid the management fee for the years in between. The redemption is done in kind and is not itself a taxable event, so nothing catastrophic happens. But it does mean the liquidity is much narrower than the words "you can redeem early" imply, and anyone whose seven year horizon is really a three year horizon should treat this product as illiquid and plan accordingly.
After seven years the picture is genuinely good. There is no mandatory redemption point, the fund continues as long as investors remain, redemption fees are gone, the management fee drops to 0.25%, and you receive a pro-rata diversified basket. Flagship investors can choose the mix of ETF shares and individual stocks; Access investors receive a basket of 20 to 25 stocks.
One more practical detail that rarely makes it into reviews: because the fund is a limited partnership, your tax document is a Schedule K-1 rather than the 1099-B a broker sends. K-1s tend to arrive later in the filing season, and a late K-1 is one of the more common reasons a straightforward return ends up on extension. If you have run only brokerage accounts before, budget for that.
Exchange fund vs direct indexing
What the same $250,000 costs, and why the cheapest row is not automatically the right one
Every rate below is the provider's own published figure, checked in August 2026. The last column is the part that decides it, and it is not price.
| Provider | Structure | Minimum | Annual fee | Cost on $250,000 | Problem it solves |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cache Exchange Fund | Exchange fund (LP) | $100,000 | 0.85% at $250k | $2,125 | Defers tax on an existing gain |
| Frec Classic, S&P 500 | Direct indexing | $20,000 | 0.09% | $225 | Harvests losses on new money |
| Wealthfront S&P 500 Direct | Direct indexing | $5,000 | 0.09% | $225 | Harvests losses on new money |
| Fidelity Managed FidFolios | Direct indexing (SMA) | $5,000 to invest | 0.40% | $1,000 | Harvests losses on new money |
| Schwab Personalized Indexing | Direct indexing (SMA) | $100,000 | 0.40% | $1,000 | Harvests losses on new money |
| S&P 500 ETF | Index fund | 1 share | 0.03% to 0.10% | $75 to $250 | Neither. You sell and pay the tax |
Direct indexing does not solve a gain you already have
This is the sentence most comparisons skip. Direct indexing harvests losses on money you are investing now. It does nothing about the $800,000 of embedded gain sitting in the stock you were granted eight years ago. To diversify that through a direct indexing account you have to sell it first, which is exactly the tax event you were trying to avoid. If your problem is an existing concentrated position with a large gain, a nine basis point account is not a cheaper version of an exchange fund, it is an answer to a different question.
And an exchange fund defers, it does not forgive
The mirror of that: your basis carries over into the units and then into whatever you redeem, so the gain follows you. What you have bought is time, and time is worth real money when the alternative is paying up to 23.8% federally today and losing the compounding on it. Two situations make the deferral close to permanent rather than merely long: holding until death, when the basis steps up for heirs, and donating appreciated units to charity. If neither applies and you expect to sell in five years anyway, run the arithmetic before you accept a seven year lock.
Who it fits
Four situations where the answer is clear before you run any numbers
A large gain and a long horizon
You hold $500,000 or more of one stock, most of it is gain, and you have no need for the money inside seven years. This is the case exchange funds were built for, and the deferral usually beats the fee.
A gain you plan to hold until death or donate
Deferral becomes close to permanent. Heirs get a stepped-up basis, and appreciated units given to charity avoid the gain entirely. Here the seven year lock costs you very little.
New money, no embedded gain
Nothing to defer, so the fee, the lock and the K-1 are pure cost. An index fund or a direct indexing account wins, and it is not close.
Under $100,000, or you need the money sooner
Cache's schedule starts at $100,000, and an early exit returns your original stock plus a 1% or 2% fee. Below that size or inside that horizon, look at direct indexing or at simply selling in tranches across tax years.
Whichever way it goes, the thing you end up holding is an index. Our index construction tool lets you build that basket, weight it, and backtest the construction against real market history before you commit capital to any of these providers. We are analysis software: we do not custody assets, place trades or give tax advice.
Questions people actually ask
Cache exchange fund questions, answered from Cache's own published material
What are Cache Exchange Fund fees?
Cache charges an annual management fee of 0.40% to 0.95% on the fund's gross assets, billed monthly at one twelfth of the annual rate. The rate depends on your cumulative contributions and is not bracketed: once you qualify for a tier, that single rate applies to your whole balance. The entry tier of $100,000 to $249,999 pays 0.95%, and 0.40% requires $25,000,000. After seven years the fee drops to 0.25%. There are no sales, subscription or performance fees, but underlying ETF expenses apply in the Flagship series and early redemptions carry a 1% fee in Flagship funds and 2% in Access funds.
What is the Cache Exchange Fund minimum?
Cache's published fee schedule starts at a $100,000 tier, so $100,000 is the effective entry point for the exchange fund. The Access fund series is open to accredited investors. The Flagship series, which is where the Index Sync feature lives, is open to qualified purchasers, defined as having $5,000,000 or more in investments. If you are working with less than $100,000, the exchange fund question answers itself and the realistic options are direct indexing or simply selling and paying the tax.
How do exchange funds work?
You contribute appreciated stock to a partnership instead of selling it. In return you receive units of a pooled fund built around a benchmark index, so your economic exposure is diversified from the moment the exchange closes, and the contribution itself is not a taxable event. Your cost basis carries over. After seven years you can redeem a diversified basket of securities rather than your original shares, which is the point of the structure. Tax rules require the fund to hold 20% of its assets in qualifying illiquid assets such as real estate.
Does Cache or Frec have lower tracking error for S&P 500 direct indexing?
Frec, on its own published figures. Cache guides investors to an annualised tracking error target of 2% to 4% for its exchange funds and says it aims to improve on that with Index Sync. Frec headlines plus or minus 1% and its footnote reports an observed standard deviation of excess return of roughly plus or minus 0.77% annually across 36 simulation runs. The gap is structural rather than a matter of skill: an exchange fund must hold 20% of its assets in qualifying illiquid assets, so it cannot replicate an equity index as closely as an account that holds only the stocks.
What are the pros and cons of exchange funds?
The pro is specific and large: you diversify a concentrated position without realising the capital gain, which at a 23.8% federal long-term rate on a large embedded gain is real money kept invested. The cons are a seven year lock to get the tax-deferred basket, a management fee well above an index fund, a mandatory 20% illiquid sleeve, tracking error of 2% to 4%, a Schedule K-1 instead of a 1099, and deferral rather than forgiveness. Your basis carries over, so the tax is postponed, not cancelled.
Can I get my money out of a Cache exchange fund early?
Yes, but the exit is not what most people expect. Before the seventh anniversary the tax code requires redemptions be satisfied by returning your original contributed stock rather than a diversified basket, and Cache charges 1% in its Flagship funds and 2% in its Access funds. So an early exit hands you back the concentrated position you joined to escape, minus a fee. After seven years there is no mandatory redemption point and no redemption fee, and you receive a pro-rata diversified basket instead.
I have $50k and want pure direct indexing, not blended ETFs. Should I use Frec or Cache?
At $50,000 this is not really a choice. Cache's published fee schedule starts at $100,000, so the exchange fund is out of reach, and an exchange fund is the wrong instrument anyway unless your problem is an existing embedded gain. Frec's S&P 500 Classic strategy takes $20,000 at 0.09%, and Wealthfront S&P 500 Direct takes $5,000 at the same rate. Both hold the individual stocks rather than blended ETFs, which is what the question is asking for.
Are exchange funds better than ETFs?
They answer a different question. If you are investing new money, an ETF is cheaper on every axis and an exchange fund makes no sense. An exchange fund exists for one situation: you already hold a large appreciated position, selling it would trigger a capital gains bill you do not want to pay, and you want diversification anyway. In that narrow case the deferral can outweigh a fee that is roughly ten times an index fund's. Outside it, the fee, the lock-up and the K-1 are pure cost.
Does Cache Exchange Fund have a track record?
Only a partial one. Cache says it has exceeded $1 billion in assets, and it reported a 0.99 correlation to the benchmark for its Nasdaq-100 fund, Unix, in 2025. But Cache also states plainly in its own help centre that no fund has completed a full seven year cycle yet. Since the seven year redemption is the entire mechanism, no investor has yet been through the step that the product is sold on. That is worth weighing, and it is Cache's own disclosure rather than an outside criticism.
What tax form do you get from an exchange fund?
A Schedule K-1, because exchange funds are structured as limited partnerships. This matters more than it sounds. K-1s are commonly issued later in the filing season than the 1099-B a broker sends in February, and a late K-1 is one of the more common reasons an otherwise simple return goes on extension. A direct indexing account at a broker reports on a 1099-B and does not create this problem.
Go deeper
Know what index you want before you pick the wrapper
Build the index, weight it your way, backtest the construction against real market history and track it against the S&P 500. No minimum, no seven year lock, from $12 a month.